Tuesday 15 December 2009

Freedom of Speech - More Than Words?

Enshrined within the Charter of Fundamental Rights, a core criterion that must be met by each member state, is the necessity for freedom of speech. It's in Chapter two, under the ingeniously titled section "Freedoms".

I'm sure you are all too familiar with Eurosceptics complaining that the machinations of the European Parliament, Commission and Council mean such freedoms are rarely filtered down into the actual operation of democracy. But with regards to free speech, the EU have really played a trump card now.

They have decided that all references to gender be banned. Alongside the use of Miss, Madam, Signor, Frau et al ,gender related words are now blacklisted. Sportsmen must become athletes, statesmen must be referred to as political leaders and even the term man-made is to be replaced by synthetic.

At least finally the EU are denying that Climate Change is a man-made problem!

The problem however is what bloody use does this sort of legislation serve other than to get on people's nerves? How can you ban words?!!!They are the fundamental building blocks of thought, speech, expression, debate, communication, freedom and power. If one is entitled to free speech, surely he can pick the words he uses? It doesn't matter where you begin, this is already an infringement of free expression and we can only go downhill from here.

This will, supposedly, especially affect Bingo, where the calls are now seen to be, gosh I don't know, sexist? I've never heard a female pensioner in a bingo hall protest at the number 88 being called two fat ladies. A whole programme featuring two rather rotund female cooks ran under that exact same name without complaint.

I suppose as well under the latest guidance that all food must be labeled in origin perhaps we will next have to return words to their rightful owners. The french can have "duvet" back - we'll manage with "bedding" and "quilt". I suppose we'd have to give India back "Bungalow" and Eskimos "anorak" and "kayak." Whilst we may have custody of "internet" "babysitting" and "cheeseburger" there would likely be a tussle with America.

Repressing the use of certain words will not only affect a large number of organisations and institutions that currently trade under now "outlawed words", it may have an effect on language itself. But whilst it is by no means a laughing matter, there is certainly fun to be found. So I have been thinking of which expressions now face EU censorship...

One would imagine Batman, Superman, Spiderman and even Bananaman have had to rush of down to De-Poll to rectify the problem of their names. Man Utd may have to rethink their acronym. Earl Grey Tea will be cast into doubt. And what on earth will Geordies punctuate their sentences with? Wahaye person?

Well all I can say is the lot of them are the offspring of canines for coming up with such madness.

6 comments:

  1. I`ve just seen you ask Ms Baroso, to earn his, hers, Miss, Mr, Mrs or it`s wages & spend more time at work (not much chance of that!). Please can you ask Neil Kinnock what he does for his massive wage? I`m told its £185,000 is this correct? I must say well done & thank you, please continue to pressure the EU parliament on issues that affect our freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Prime Minister Gordon Brown flies here, there and mostly yonder promising billions of non-existent British taxpayer pounds usually to fund the man-made climate change con. He's like Hitler in his bunker moving imaginary armies over a map of Europe convinced that he could still win the war.

    Gordon Brown should be labelled as a 'suicide spender' as he's doing his best to blow the British economy to bits by his give-away money madness.

    ReplyDelete
  3. (To, Second Anon), The worse thing is it's not todays tax money, but tomorrows tax's Gordon Clown is spending (is that a Freudian slip? No!). It wasn't he is not funny, but he is a clown and he didn't pay for the flights or the hotels. He Quantitative eased the bill,.. By.hell does Lord Kinnock get that much money. John the free speech thing is just Orwellian.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have always thought that Climate Change was a synthetic problem.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The greatest fear is not just the incredible amounts of money we pay to Brussels, but the fact that they are trying to castrate our fiscal independence by targeting the City.They have chosen the perfect time, when the public are disillusioned with bankers, to send them all packing to Zurich, along with their power and money. Love them or loathe them, we are better off with them in London than in Switzerland. I fear chaps, if we lose the City, we no longer make anything in this country. The blow to our economic future would be tremendous...Thanks for your comments everyone

    ReplyDelete
  6. Man made global warming becomes "synthetic" global warming, as in not real.
    Yes I'll go along with that.

    ReplyDelete